tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5897197.post4353555799589592427..comments2023-10-31T19:42:52.968+07:00Comments on random exegesis: New articleUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5897197.post-58177191657329414542007-04-17T09:15:00.000+07:002007-04-17T09:15:00.000+07:00Aco, first tier journal! Congratulations! This is ...Aco, first tier journal! Congratulations! This is a very important milestone, hopefully one of many!Ujanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11743023980780274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5897197.post-47883352920620449192007-04-16T14:27:00.000+07:002007-04-16T14:27:00.000+07:00Yes, we love RP more than SP. But in case you do n...Yes, we love RP more than SP. But in case you do not have any access to RP, use SP.<BR/><BR/>On Lapindo, I have it mentioned in my paper in BIES December issue.Acohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16457844915547531461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5897197.post-53497445796951710002007-04-16T14:03:00.000+07:002007-04-16T14:03:00.000+07:00Sorry my teacher,your abstract is still unclear fo...Sorry my teacher,your abstract is still unclear for me (may be caused I do not understand this journal exactly). But, I remember about your teaching in the class that economists tend to believe revealed pereference rather than stated preference in the case of environmental valuation. You said that to trust "what they do" not "what they say". But now, you show me that you use SP in your research. Do you believe their preferences? One more question, how about "Lumpur Lapindo" case? Why do not I see the role of economists in applying environmental economics in this case? Where are they?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com